# Dev Intel Pipeline v2 — Phase 7: System-Level Documentation Generation

**Status:** DRAFT v2 (post-SPA Round 1)
**Author:** Max (AI) + Brian (Human)
**Date:** 2026-03-09
**Depends on:** Phases 1-6 (extract, graph, namespace, semantic-diff, pipeline, docgen)

---

## Problem Statement

The V2 pipeline generates accurate file-level documentation ("this module exports X, depends on Y, calls Z"). But real platform documentation — like the Foxtrot Confluence docs — operates at the *system level*: subsystem architecture, cross-subsystem data flows, configuration contracts, deployment pipelines, and layered dependency narratives.

File-level docs are reference material. System-level docs are what engineers actually read to understand how things work.

## Goal

Extend the V2 pipeline to generate Foxtrot-quality system documentation from the code knowledge graph, organized in the Divio documentation framework (Tutorials, How-To, Reference, Explanation).

## Success Criteria

All metrics are validated against a **ground truth fixture repository** (`test/fixtures/system-docs/`) containing a hand-labeled mini codebase (~30 files across 5 subsystems) with expected outputs for each module.

| Metric | Target | How Measured |
|--------|--------|-------------|
| Subsystem detection accuracy | ≥90% of modules correctly clustered | Compare `subsystem.js` output against `expected-subsystems.json` fixture. Accuracy = correctly assigned files / total files. |
| Cross-subsystem dependency completeness | ≥85% of actual inter-subsystem edges captured | Compare dependency matrix against `expected-deps.json`. Recall = captured edges / expected edges. |
| Contract extraction recall | ≥80% of exported interfaces/types extracted | Compare extracted contracts against `expected-contracts.json`. Recall = extracted / total annotated. |
| Generated doc structure | Matches Divio 4-category template | Structural assertion: verify directory layout, required sections present in each generated .md file. |
| Incremental update precision | Only subsystems touched by semantic diff get regenerated | Apply a mock diff to fixture, assert only expected subsystem docs are regenerated (content hashing / md5sum check, avoid mtime flakiness). |
| Cascading invalidation | Shared subsystem change propagates to dependents | Apply a diff to a shared subsystem in fixture, assert dependent subsystem docs are also flagged for regeneration. |
| LLM cost per full generation | ≤$2 (using local Ollama for drafting) | BACKLOGGED — measure token count statically in CI (e.g. via `tiktoken`) without hitting API. |
| Flow tracer terminates | All traces complete in <5s on 4,325-file graph | Wall-clock assertion on OpenClaw snapshot. |

## Ground Truth Fixture Repository

Located at `test/fixtures/system-docs/`. Contains:

```
test/fixtures/system-docs/
├── src/
│   ├── gateway/          (5 files: server.ts, session.ts, middleware.ts, types.ts, utils.ts)
│   ├── agents/           (5 files: runner.ts, scope.ts, tools.ts, types.ts, defaults.ts)
│   ├── channels/
│   │   ├── telegram.ts
│   │   └── discord.ts
│   ├── config/           (3 files: config.ts, schema.ts, types.ts)
│   └── utils/            (3 files: logger.ts, crypto.ts, fs-helpers.ts)
├── expected-subsystems.json       ← hand-labeled subsystem assignments
├── expected-deps.json             ← hand-labeled inter-subsystem edges
├── expected-contracts.json        ← hand-labeled interfaces/types
├── expected-flows.json            ← hand-labeled flow traces for 2 entry points
├── expected-diagrams/             ← expected Mermaid source for each diagram type
└── architecture.md                ← mock architecture doc for ingestion testing
```

**Edge cases included in fixtures:**
- `utils/` as a cross-cutting concern (high fan-out, should be tagged as `cross-cutting`)
- Circular dependency: `gateway/session.ts` ↔ `agents/runner.ts` (mutual CALLS)
- Orphan file: `config/schema.ts` (no inbound edges, only exports)
- Re-exported interface: `gateway/types.ts` re-exports from `config/types.ts`
- Empty subsystem: `channels/` has only 2 files with no internal CALLS edges

## Architecture

### 7A: Subsystem Aggregator (`subsystem.js`)

**Purpose:** Group file-level entities into logical subsystems and compute inter-subsystem relationships.

**Clustering Strategy (tiered):**

1. **Directory-based (default):** Top-level directory under `src/` = subsystem. `gateway/`, `agents/`, `cli/`, `telegram/`, etc. Simple, deterministic, zero-config.

2. **Config-driven (override):** Optional `subsystems.yaml` that maps directories to named subsystems with human labels and grouping overrides.
   ```yaml
   subsystems:
     - name: Gateway
       label: "Session & Request Gateway"
       paths: ["gateway/", "routing/"]
     - name: Agents
       label: "AI Agent Runtime"
       paths: ["agents/", "auto-reply/"]
     - name: Channels
       label: "Channel Adapters"
       paths: ["telegram/", "discord/", "slack/", "signal/", "whatsapp/"]
   ```

3. **Graph-based (future):** Community detection (Louvain/label propagation) on the CALLS+IMPORTS graph to find natural clusters. Useful for repos without clean directory boundaries.

**Cross-cutting concern detection:**
Subsystems where >60% of edges are **inbound** from other subsystems (high fan-in — many subsystems depend on them, but they depend on almost nothing) are automatically tagged as `cross-cutting`. Examples: `utils/`, `config/`, `types/`. The metric is `inbound_edges / total_edges > 0.6`. Cross-cutting subsystems are:
- Excluded from the dependency matrix visualization (reduces hairball)
- Documented separately as "Shared Infrastructure" in the reference docs
- Still tracked in the raw dependency data for completeness

**Output:**
```json
{
  "subsystems": [
    {
      "name": "gateway",
      "label": "Session & Request Gateway",
      "kind": "domain",
      "files": ["gateway/session-utils.ts", "gateway/server.ts"],
      "entities": { "functions": 142, "classes": 3, "modules": 28 },
      "publicExports": ["deriveSessionTitle", "loadSessionEntry"],
      "internalDeps": [{"from": "gateway", "to": "agents", "edges": 89, "type": "CALLS"}],
      "externalDeps": ["commander", "node:fs", "node:path"]
    }
  ],
  "crossCutting": ["utils", "config"],
  "dependencyMatrix": {
    "gateway→agents": { "calls": 89, "imports": 34 },
    "agents→config": { "calls": 156, "imports": 120 }
  }
}
```

**Tests (7A):**
| Test | Input | Expected |
|------|-------|----------|
| Directory clustering | Fixture repo | Matches `expected-subsystems.json` (5 subsystems) |
| Config override | Fixture + `subsystems.yaml` merging gateway+routing | Merged subsystem with combined files |
| Cross-cutting detection | Fixture `utils/` (high fan-out) | Tagged as `cross-cutting` |
| Empty subsystem | Fixture `channels/` (2 files, no internal calls) | Valid subsystem with 0 internal edges |
| Orphan file | `config/schema.ts` (no inbound) | Assigned to `config` subsystem, not dropped |

### 7B: Contract Extractor (`contracts.js`)

**Purpose:** Extract TypeScript interfaces, type aliases, enums, and config schemas as first-class graph entities.

**What to extract:**
- `interface Foo { ... }` → entity type `Interface`, with fields as properties
- `type Foo = { ... }` → entity type `TypeAlias`
- `enum Foo { ... }` → entity type `Enum`, with members
- Exported `const` objects used as config defaults → entity type `ConfigContract`
- YAML schema keys (from config files) → entity type `ConfigSchema`

**Relationships:**
- `IMPLEMENTS` — class → interface
- `ACCEPTS` — function parameter → interface/type (function signature contracts)
- `RETURNS` — function → return type
- `EXTENDS` — interface → interface

**Error handling:**
- If tree-sitter fails to parse a file, skip it and log a warning (same as Phase 1 extract.js behavior)
- Re-exported interfaces (`export { Foo } from './types'`) are tracked via the existing IMPORTS edge; the contract extractor resolves the original definition
- Deeply nested type literals (>3 levels) are flattened to `object` to avoid graph bloat

**Tests (7B):**
| Test | Input | Expected |
|------|-------|----------|
| Interface extraction | `gateway/types.ts` with 3 interfaces | 3 Interface entities with correct fields |
| Type alias | `type SessionKey = string` | 1 TypeAlias entity |
| Enum extraction | `enum Status { Active, Inactive }` | 1 Enum entity with 2 members |
| Re-exported interface | `gateway/types.ts` re-exports from `config/types.ts` | Resolved to original definition |
| Parse failure | Malformed TS file | Skipped with warning, no crash |
| Recall benchmark | Fixture repo | ≥80% of `expected-contracts.json` extracted |

### 7C: Flow Tracer (`flow.js`)

**Purpose:** Given an entry point, walk the call graph across subsystem boundaries and produce a sequenced narrative of the data flow.

**Algorithm:**
1. Start at entry point entity (e.g., `telegram/bot-handlers.ts:onMessage`)
2. BFS through CALLS edges, recording subsystem transitions
3. **Cycle detection:** Maintain a visited set per trace. If a node is revisited, record the cycle and stop that branch (do not re-enter).
4. **God object pruning:** Before tracing, compute in-degree for all nodes. Nodes with in-degree > `godThreshold` (default: 50) are excluded from traversal (they're utility functions called by everything — not meaningful flow participants). Logged as "excluded high-connectivity nodes."
5. **Depth limit:** Stop at depth N (configurable, default 8). Each subsystem boundary crossing increments depth by 1; intra-subsystem hops increment by 0.5 (prioritizes cross-subsystem flow).
6. **Test file exclusion:** Skip any file matching `*.test.*`, `*.spec.*`, `test/`, `__tests__/`.
7. At each subsystem boundary crossing, record: source subsystem → target subsystem, via which function call
8. Output: ordered list of subsystem hops with the specific function calls that cross boundaries

**Output (deterministic JSON — testable without LLM):**
```json
{
  "entryPoint": "telegram/bot-handlers.ts:onMessage",
  "depth": 8,
  "godThreshold": 50,
  "excludedNodes": ["utils/logger.ts:log", "config/config.ts:getConfig"],
  "cyclesDetected": [
    { "at": "gateway/session.ts:loadSession", "backEdgeTo": "agents/runner.ts:runAgent" }
  ],
  "flow": [
    { "subsystem": "telegram", "entity": "telegram/bot-handlers.ts:onMessage", "depth": 0 },
    { "subsystem": "routing", "entity": "routing/session-key.ts:resolveKey", "depth": 1, "crossedVia": "CALLS" },
    { "subsystem": "gateway", "entity": "gateway/session.ts:loadSession", "depth": 2, "crossedVia": "CALLS" },
    { "subsystem": "agents", "entity": "agents/runner.ts:runAgent", "depth": 3, "crossedVia": "CALLS" }
  ],
  "subsystemSequence": ["telegram", "routing", "gateway", "agents"]
}
```

**LLM narration (separate step):** The deterministic JSON flow is the testable artifact. LLM narration is applied *after* as a formatting pass in 7D. This means:
- Flow correctness is tested against `expected-flows.json` (deterministic)
- LLM prose quality is evaluated separately (human review, not CI)

**Performance guarantee:** BFS with visited set + god object pruning + depth limit = O(V+E) bounded by depth. On the OpenClaw graph (23k nodes, 142k edges), traces must complete in <5 seconds. If a trace exceeds 5s, it is killed and logged as a timeout.

**Tests (7C):**
| Test | Input | Expected |
|------|-------|----------|
| Simple linear flow | Fixture entry point A→B→C across 3 subsystems | Matches `expected-flows.json` |
| Cycle detection | Fixture circular dep gateway↔agents | Cycle recorded, trace continues without loop |
| God object exclusion | Entry point that calls `utils/logger.ts:log` (high in-degree) | `log` excluded from trace |
| Depth limit | Deep call chain (>8 hops) | Trace stops at depth 8 |
| Test file exclusion | Entry point that calls a test helper | Test file skipped |
| Performance | OpenClaw full snapshot | <5s wall clock |
| Empty trace | Entry point with no outgoing CALLS | Returns flow with single entry, no hops |

### 7D: Hierarchical Doc Generator (`sysdoc.js`)

**Purpose:** Orchestrate 7A-7C to produce a complete documentation site in Divio structure.

**Output structure:**
```
docs/
├── tutorials/
│   └── (human-authored only — not auto-generated)
├── reference/
│   ├── system-architecture.md      ← from subsystem aggregator + dependency matrix
│   ├── subsystems/
│   │   ├── gateway.md              ← per-subsystem: purpose, exports, deps, key modules
│   │   ├── agents.md
│   │   └── ...
│   ├── contracts/
│   │   ├── session-types.md        ← from contract extractor
│   │   └── ...
│   └── modules/
│       └── (existing file-level docs from Phase 6)
├── explanation/
│   ├── architecture-patterns.md    ← from dependency matrix analysis
│   ├── data-flows.md              ← from flow tracer (LLM-narrated flow traces)
│   └── design-decisions.md        ← from architecture.md ingestion + commit history
```

**Divio category mapping (corrected):**
- **Tutorials:** Human-authored only. Not generated.
- **Reference:** System architecture, per-subsystem docs, contracts, module docs. All deterministic structure + LLM prose.
- **Explanation:** Architecture patterns (from dependency analysis), data flows (from flow traces — these explain *how the system works*, not *how to do a task*), design decisions (from architecture.md + commit history).
- **How-To:** Not auto-generated in MVP. Requires domain-specific task knowledge. Deferred.

**Generation pipeline:**
1. Run subsystem aggregator → subsystem map + dependency matrix
2. Run contract extractor → interface/type entities added to graph
3. Run flow tracer on configured entry points → deterministic flow JSONs
4. For each subsystem: generate reference doc (LLM with subsystem context + architecture.md sections)
5. Generate system architecture overview (LLM with full dependency matrix)
6. Generate data flow explanations (LLM narrates flow JSONs into prose)
7. Generate Mermaid diagrams (7E) and embed in docs

**Incremental updates with cascading invalidation:**
1. Semantic diff identifies changed files
2. Map changed files → directly affected subsystems (set A)
3. For each subsystem in A, find all subsystems that depend on it (set B = dependents of A in dependency matrix)
4. Regeneration set = A ∪ B
5. System architecture overview regenerated only if dependency matrix changed (new/removed inter-subsystem edges)
6. Flow traces regenerated only if any entity in the trace path was modified

**Tests (7D):**
| Test | Input | Expected |
|------|-------|----------|
| Full generation | Fixture repo | Correct directory structure with all expected .md files |
| Section completeness | Generated subsystem doc | Contains: Purpose, Key Modules, Public API, Dependencies sections |
| Incremental: direct change | Modify `gateway/server.ts` | Only `gateway.md` + dependents regenerated |
| Incremental: cascading | Modify `config/types.ts` (shared) | `config.md` + all subsystems importing config regenerated |
| Incremental: no-op | No semantic diff | Zero files regenerated |
| Architecture.md ingestion | Fixture with `architecture.md` | LLM prompt includes architecture.md content |

### 7E: Diagram Generator (`diagrams.js`)

**Purpose:** Auto-generate Mermaid diagrams from graph analysis outputs.

**Diagram types:**

1. **Subsystem Dependency Graph** (from 7A dependency matrix)
   - Nodes = subsystems (excluding cross-cutting)
   - Edges = inter-subsystem CALLS/IMPORTS with edge weight labels
   - Cross-cutting subsystems shown as a separate "Shared" cluster

2. **Flow Sequence Diagram** (from 7C flow traces)
   - Participants = subsystems in flow order
   - Messages = function calls at boundary crossings
   - Cycles shown as self-referencing notes

3. **Contract Relationship Diagram** (from 7B contracts)
   - Classes/interfaces with fields
   - IMPLEMENTS/EXTENDS relationships as arrows

**Rendering:** Use `mmdr` (Rust Mermaid renderer) to produce SVG. Embed in generated Markdown docs as `![diagram](./diagrams/subsystem-deps.svg)`.

**Tests (7E):**
| Test | Input | Expected |
|------|-------|----------|
| Dependency diagram | Fixture dependency matrix | Valid Mermaid syntax, matches `expected-diagrams/deps.mmd` |
| Sequence diagram | Fixture flow trace | Valid Mermaid syntax, correct participant order |
| Contract diagram | Fixture contracts | Valid Mermaid syntax, correct relationships |
| Rendering | Any generated .mmd file | mmdr produces valid SVG without errors |

## Architecture.md Ingestion

Each repo may contain human-written architecture documentation. The pipeline:

1. **Discovery:** Scan for `architecture.md`, `docs/architecture.md`, `ARCHITECTURE.md`, `docs/design.md` in repo root
2. **Parsing:** Extract sections (headings → content blocks) as structured context
3. **Injection:** When generating subsystem docs or explanation docs, include relevant architecture.md sections in the LLM prompt alongside graph data
4. **Diff tracking:** If `architecture.md` changes between releases, flag it in the semantic diff as a documentation-relevant change

## Cross-Repo Output Model

Two output modes:

**Per-repo (reference only):**
- Subsystem architecture docs
- Contract reference
- Module reference
- Mermaid diagrams
- Useful for repo maintainers

**Unified (full Divio):**
- Merges per-repo graphs via namespace registry (Phase 3) into super-graph
- Runs 7A-7E on super-graph
- Generates cross-repo flow traces and dependency diagrams
- Includes human-authored tutorials and explanation docs
- Useful for platform consumers and new engineers

## Implementation Phases

| Phase | Module | Effort | Depends On |
|-------|--------|--------|------------|
| 7-fixtures | Ground truth fixture repo | 0.5 day | — |
| 7A | `subsystem.js` + tests | 1 day | graph.js, fixtures |
| 7B | `contracts.js` + tests | 2 days | extract.js, fixtures |
| 7C | `flow.js` + tests | 2 days | graph.js, subsystem.js, fixtures |
| 7D | `sysdoc.js` + tests | 2 days | 7A, 7B, 7C, docgen.js |
| 7E | `diagrams.js` + tests | 1 day | 7A, 7C, 7B |
| 7F | `supergraph.js` (Multi-repo Merge) | 1 day | namespace.js, graph.js |

**Total: ~9.5 days**

**Critical path:** fixtures → 7A → 7C → 7D
**Parallel:** 7B, 7E, and 7F can run in parallel with core phases.

**Build loop (BMad Wiggum):** Each phase follows: build → test → BMad review → revise → re-review until GO.

## Constraints

- No new external dependencies (same as Phases 1-5)
- LLM calls only for prose generation — all structural analysis is deterministic
- tree-sitter@0.21.1 compatibility maintained
- Templates are Markdown with simple mustache-style slots (no template engine dependency — string replacement)
- Must work on OpenClaw codebase (4,325 files) as primary benchmark
- Foxtrot repos are not available in this environment — design must work from any repo's graph snapshot
- Memory budget: graph snapshots for OpenClaw are ~30MB JSON. In-memory graph with contract entities should stay under 500MB heap. If exceeded, implement streaming extraction (process files in batches, merge partial graphs).

## Resolved Decisions

1. **Tutorials:** Human-authored only. Flow traces inform but don't generate tutorials — domain knowledge required.
2. **Design decisions:** Infer from commit history + semantic diffs AND parse `architecture.md` from each repo.
3. **Cross-repo:** Both per-repo (reference) and unified (full Divio). Different audiences.
4. **Mermaid diagrams:** Yes, via 7E. Three diagram types: dependency, sequence, contract.
5. **Architecture.md ingestion:** Parsed and injected as LLM context for subsystem and explanation docs.
6. **Flow traces are Explanation, not How-To:** Corrected Divio mapping. How-To deferred from MVP.
7. **LLM output is not CI-tested:** All testable artifacts are deterministic JSON. LLM prose is a formatting pass evaluated by human review.
